Added not wasm config for get_ancestors #386
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #386 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 78.25% 78.23% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 275 275
Lines 27447 27454 +7
==========================================
Hits 21479 21479
- Misses 5968 5975 +7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Hinton
reviewed
Aug 15, 2025
…lectionViewNodeItem
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🎟️ Tracking
PM-25167
📔 Objective
Adds conditional code for when wasm feature isn't enabled for get_ancestors.
⏰ Reminders before review
team
🦮 Reviewer guidelines
:+1:) or similar for great changes:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info:question:) for questions:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmedissue and could potentially benefit from discussion
:art:) for suggestions / improvements:x:) or:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes